50 Years After the 1965 War: What Has Changed in India-Pakistan Relations?

Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money

1. Pakistan successfully defended its territory and captured Muna Bao inside India. They also blasted Indian tank offences in Chawinda and other locations. PAF Destroyed 100 plus IAF jets.
2. complete nonesens by Pakistanis.
3. India Won the War!! eff off Pakis!
   read neutral sorces!
4. why their is no indian on the panel????
5. Nothing new. Pakistan has terror as state policy. How Baluch was grabbed by having atrocities on them. Similar view was prevailing for Kashmir. Pakistan is fooling entire west as co-partner as fight against terror. Still such a talk does not have value!!!
6. Now India does not need any kind of relation with Pakistan. We have learned to live and deal with Pakistan's terrorism. If India continues to refuse any kind of relations with Pakistan for next 10 years it will automatically disappear (They will kill themselves). Patience has great power. Peace is now need of Pakistan not India (We have will-power and instruments for protection because we do not believe Pak)
7. Instead of beating around the bush why don't you accept the truth that when Nehru died Pakistan thought it to be a good opportunity to gulp Kashmir and sent military in disguise of tribal and they started guerilla warfare. Though there was a vacuum of leadership because of Nehru's death and India had already fought a war with China in 1962. But soon Indian forces understood that infiltrators were Pak soldiers and cleaned them in retaliation. India crossed the border and reached up-to Lahore and Navy ships were bombarding Karachi. As always idiot Indian congress leaders could not translate this great victory into gains on negotiating tables. This failure to translate victory into something meaningful just because of some stupid belief in non-violence and over kindness towards enemy might have led to Prime Minister Lalbahdur Shastri's suspicious death in Tashkent (USSR) immediately after negotiations. Pakistan did not learn any lesson and continued its anti India activities or even increased it because India did not cripple it enough so that it does not stand again.
8. Shuja Nawaz and all porkies , if they feel that injustice was done to  porkistan  by not declaring them as winners in the war  , they can try again .... but we fail to understand why they are waging proxy wars like cowards.....they are not going to get Kashmir by proxy war .... if you have courage fight on fronts not from behind the fronts like cowards
9. Why should we work with pakistan, that country wants our state had initiated every war and still think that they can beat us anytime, who the hell are they they send most of the terrorist in our country, 2 of the 4 panelists are muslims you can't be serious really, haffez sayed isn't getting any trial and still giving hatred speech against us, isi is supporting taliban and every terrorist organization that is working against india. We don't want to go to war with pakistan, but pakistan should also know that they are no russia and we aren't ukraine we would crush them even if they think about that
10. U EXPERTS NEVER BLAME PAKISTAN BCZ PAKISTAN IS NOT A PEACE LOVING COUNTRY AND ITS BIRTH
11. Hussain Haqqani, I doubt the credibility of Hudson institute after watching this ill informed people are made fellow. 1965 war Pakistan lost and all the 4 war. You can say you were saved and you saved your ass from the wrath of Indian Army, that way you can celebrate you survived.
12. At the end of it all at 1:31:30 we realize pak needs a gandhi for army to respect.
    What revelation
    sala noodles bana diya
13. Why can't Indian wo/men ask A QUESTION .....rather than mixing their OWN answers included in the question.....confused people for sure ....
14. Pakistan and India should go forward for peace rather making each other and developing weapons to kill each other. It is better work for development, poverty, economy, which helps all. Time quiet such all these terrible things. Time to give a chance to peace and Development.
15. PAKISTAN WAS CREATED BY UK AND SUPPORTED BY USA
16. ITS VERY SAD THAT NO ONE IS SAYING THAT FROM D DAY ONE USA AND OF UK R HELPING PAKISTAN
17. Discussing India Pakistan without an Indian to give the Indian perspective is like having a marriage without the groom / bride!!!!
18. What bullshit, as usual the biased americans didn't bother to invite a indian on the panel. Americans got bitch slapped cause they supported pakistan. Russians are more trust worthy than the americans.
19. infidels kaffirs
20. Don't really understand Stephen Cohen. In almost all the interviews or talks of him that I have watched, he always seems to try and rationalize Pakistani misadventures as being provoked by India in some form or the other ( for eg: here: @6:51 ) , when in reality, history stands witness that the self-sustaining pathological hatred that revisionist Army of Pakistan harbors and nurtures against India, does not fit any model of rational behavior. Secondly, contrary to what Shuja Nawaj ( brother of Asif Nawaz -ex Pak Army chief who fought in '65 and '71 wars) mentions, HajiPir pass operation by 1st Para Battalion of the Indian army was not a preemptive operation, rather a counter-op to capture the mountain pass from where the Pakistani regular army and Islamic militia (tribal mujahideens) poured into Kashmir as part of Pakistani Operation GIBRALTAR in 1965 ,and before that in the Kashmir War of 1947. After the failure of Op GIBRALTAR to meet its end goal - annexing Kashmir - Pakistan Army proceeded to launch Operation Grand Slam on September 1 1965, to capture Akhnoor and then Jammu. Shuja Nawaz's portrayal of Indian Army as the aggressor and Pak Army as the defenders is contrary to what happened in reality.