Best Analysis of Demonetisation Scheme of PM Modi

Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money

1. dont beleive this bhapa , he alsi got new notes before public ,
2. THIS IS THE FIRST SARDAR JI WHO I THINK IS SPEAKING SO OBJECTIVELY AND SENSIBLY. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK AND SEE IF YOU CAN JOIN LOCAL POLITICS AS MLA, AND THROW THESE TUMOROUS PEOPLE OUT OF DIRTY POLITICS. wkwj !!
3. IT IS NOT "DROCANIAN" IT IS "DRACONIAN" LAW
4. https://youtu.be/sloKoeayvFo
5. demonitisation is eyewash...sardarji aapko bewakuf banaya jaa raha hai
6. Like always, this guy is paid by the BJP. Plain and simple.
7. lol --- chuut k dhakkan .... do some more investigation ... About 5 days after 8 November when the hard earned WHITE money from the middle and poor class started pouring into the banks, Modi wrote off Seven thousand corore rupees worth of bad loans. This included 1200 corore Rs loan write off for Vijay Maliya alone - Other big beneficiary was Anil Ambani.
   
   Don't trust and do your own research,,, and then ..Put these facts into your sexually frustrated yet hopelessly romantic financial analysis .... gand phat k gallay mein aajeygi.
8. I. Think UR the big Duplicate Bandar -- 2000%. True
9. It is most urgent to put pressure on govt. to implement Right to Recall elected ministers to fight corruption, injustice etc. immediately, which is destroying our motherland Bharat. Jai Bharat.
10. Now is the the time for the common people to support for the nation, to make the demonitization process to succeed. Great video. Jai Hind
11. ghante ka development hoga note banning se
12. sir plz watch ur video urself.. n check hw all the objectives of demonetization hv been met
13. https://youtu.be/q4H0Q94YXeI
14. According to Kejriwal, its a scam of atleast 8000 Crores, now without making any offensive comments and using sensible language can some one explain why this Government writing off Viyay malyas,s loans ? They have given all the money collected to forgive the big corporation,s loans already.any comments ?
15. India can do
16. Hello raviji. Can you make a video about the anti-graft law amendment and its effect on demonetization ? and the money deposited in hundi of the temple
17. hahaha this decision will only effect the black cash not black gold and black land which is bigger than black cash. second this decision will not effective in reducing corruption. people will buy gold and land. we should have strong land laws rather than demonetisation the laws like gst and vat are cursed to the nation which convert white money to black
18. you are great paaji :)
19. kuch dikkat me logo ke jaan ja rahe h kya ye bhe kuch dikkat me aata h
20. India must not adopt cashless economy this is a globalists agenda to govern the entire world through back door means, people will have no control over their own lives, it will be a great mistake for public to think that black money laundering can be controlled by cashless society. This creates a climate of uncertainty that has a direct impact on the public mood.
    Sociological studies show that people in different countries and on different continents tend to see the future as murky and bleak. The future does not entice them, but frightens them. At the same time, people see no real opportunities or means for changing anything, influencing events and shaping policy. Yes, modern countries have all the attributes of democracy: Elections, freedom of speech, access to information, freedom of expression. But even in the most advanced democracies the majority of citizens have no real influence on the political process and no direct and real influence on power. People sense an ever-growing gap between their interests and the elite’s vision of the only correct course, a course the elite itself chooses. The result is that referendums and elections increasingly often create surprises for the authorities. People do not at all vote as the official and respectable media outlets advised them to, nor as the mainstream parties advised them to. Public movements that only recently were too far left or too far right are taking centre stage and pushing the political heavyweights aside. ordinary citizens who are losing trust in the ruling class. President Nixon: The Man Who Sold the World fraudulent Fiat Money, Pakistan is not obliged to pay back any foreign loans that were paid in fiat money unless the loans were in gold or silver. Pakistan should not follow IMF or world bank fraudulent guidelines, nor does it have to pay back any fraudulent loans of fiat $, that have historically been forced upon Pakistan without Pakistan public consent by the Zionist world bankers. some Pakistan and Indian media have a reality disconnect, Indian presstitutes is weak, which is why the ruling oligarchy elite chooses media outlets who are mostly without experience and knowledge is an excellent tool for the oligarchy. Indian Hindus and Indian liberals actually believed that Modi government on his own could make a difference. Apparently, the gullibility of a majority of Indians is endless. This Indian hallmark of gullibility is why a handful of Zionist globalists have been pouring fait $ in Indian economy in order to easily lead the 1 billion sheeple Indians into devastating slaughter in order to reduce the world population for Pax-Judaica to rule a manageable world population, Indian fools must wake-up, or else it's going to be too late. There is also the inability of the Indian government to understand that the Islamic eschatology toward the driving force behind Islamabad’s foreign policy leaves India puzzled at the high level of hostility toward India. As India believes that there are no psychologically cultural differences between the two countries, PM Modi doesn’t understand the hostility. However, he does understand that this hostility toward Pakistan is a negation of rules that both countries avoid surprising the other with what could be perceived as a dangerous threat. There is no sign that the Pakistani government understands the danger in India’s perception of threat or that Islamabad cares since it is ultimately eschatology that will define Pakistan’s and India’s fate. THE ZIONIST NEOCONSERVATIVE THREAT TO WORLD ORDER Washington's illegal Hegemony has been made possible only by President Nixon's reneging on the promise of backing the fait $ (paper money) subsequently withdrawal of the gold backed $ has left the enslavement of the world, therefore Pakistan is entitled to reject all fiat money loans from world bank or IMF. Today, the United States lives with federal budget deficits of more than $1 trillion each year, interest rates that are artificially held below market levels, aggregate debt that is growing much faster than the economy, and a chronic trade deficit that is larger than whole industries. What happened? How did we get from there to here? And what lessons can we draw from this relatively recent economic history to inform where we should be going? On 15 August 1971, President Nixon announced to the world that the United States was closing the gold window in a move known as the Nixon Shock. The American dollar was a “hostage in the hands of international speculators“? Hmmm . . . let’s get back to that. Note the sense of urgency he is creating with his language. “We will press for the necessary reforms to set up an urgently needed new international monetary system.” He then goes on to declare, “I am taking one further step to protect the dollar, to improve our balance of payments, and to increase jobs for America.” So, Tricky Dick (as he was known in politics) presented himself as a protector of the dollar, a warrior against inflation, and a jobs creator. That was his sales pitch. In reality, Nixon was doing the exact opposite, and, according to an analysis by Burton A. Abrams and James L. Butkiewicz of the University of Delaware, Nixon knew it. Thanks to the Nixon Tapes from the White House, we have a looking glass that gives great insight into Nixon’s true thoughts and feelings — and how they differ markedly from what he said publicly. For instance, despite calling himself a Keynesian, he was also a monetarist — at least to the extent he thought it might help him get elected in 1972. He believed that easy monetary policy could reduce unemployment in the short run and knew that presidents have a hard time getting reelected when unemployment is high. On 26 July 1971, Nixon was captured on tape stating, “I’ve never seen anybody beaten on inflation in the United States. I’ve seen many people beaten on unemployment.” When Nixon took office, unemployment was only 3.4%, but after the recession in 1969–1970, unemployment rose to 6%, where it remained. Given that Nixon had publicly stated that he would improve employment, he was committed to getting the number down by election time. Even the great Milton Friedman, who is on tape urging caution to the president over his desire for easy money, couldn’t persuade him. The tapes further reveal that Nixon arranged credible threats to the then-Fed Chairman Arthur Burns’ power as head of the Federal Reserve, including: adverse leaks about Burns to the public; the appointment of easy-money, pro-Nixon doves to the Fed board; and threats of Burns not being reappointed at the end of his term. Nixon and his Administration placed repeated pressure on Burns to ease monetary policy in late 1971 and early 1972 — with the goal of reducing unemployment in time for the election. For example, on 19 March 1971, Nixon urged Burns, “We’ve got to think of goosing it [the money supply] . . . late summer and fall of this year [1971] and next year [1972]. As you know, there’s a hell of a lag.” So, the self-fashioned “inflation warrior” pressured the Fed to print money? Say it ain’t so. In one recording, Burns states, “If interest rates go down further through my actions . . . the probability as I see it is, they will go up later on in the year and in 1972. Housing, which is recovering very nicely, will go into a tailspin in 1972. Where will we be, as a country, and as a party and me personally?” Clearly, Burns is warning Nixon of the adverse longer-term consequences of easy money. By December of 1971, Burns ultimately succumbed to the pressure, reducing the discount rate and accelerating the expansion of money supply. Moreover, the wage and price controls created the illusion of stability against a powerful backdrop of easy money. So much for the independence of the Fed. So much for the inflation warrior. So much for the defender of the US dollar. So much for the creator of jobs. These tapes clearly reveal that Nixon was looking out for himself at the expense of long-term benefits for the country and — because of the international monetary system — the world. So, ignoring what Nixon said publicly, what did his policies actually do? Nixon’s package of proposals included: Closing the gold window (elimination of the Bretton Woods gold standard). Letting the dollar float. Placing a temporary freeze on prices and wages to “combat inflation.” Placing a temporary 10% tariff on imports to “improve balance of payments.” Under the Bretton Woods system, foreigners could convert their local currencies into US dollars and then exchange these dollars for a certain amount of gold with the US Federal Reserve through the “gold window.” It was not a true gold standard, because governments did not necessarily maintain gold reserves in direct proportion to their currencies in circulation. It was, however, reasonably effective in keeping trade imbalances from forming across global economies and kept currencies tethered to something of fixed value. Here’s a snapshot of the US current account balance in the 10 years preceding the decision to close the gold window. Why INDIA Reached Mars and Pakistan Nowhere. people in India are dying of hunger, But no one sleeps hungry in Pakistan. https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2013/03/13/president-nixon-the-man-who-sold-the-world-fiat-money/