Davos 2016 - Preventing Future Shocks

Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money

1. It's absolutely terrible that fox news hosts this great panel. So much great things to learn, but many opportunities missed by this interviewer who wants to put herself in the spotlight.
2. Clearly Mr. Zhu Min ( IMF) already presented a good answer - STRONG LEADERSHIPS from Chinese President Xi Charisma - to the world economy.....GOVERNANCE is just following that only , not a big issue... the WEST must COOL down '' arrogance of head '' & dump now ...preventing future shcok prior to it comes soon. idea from taiwan province of china
3. Maria,pls respect your speaker !
4. she ruins the discussion, not to mention her attitude acting like the smartest assh*le in the room. And whats her role actually here?
5. Is this the same Paul Singer that continuously support republican candidates?
6. Leadership plays the main role, the western "small government and big free market" - democratic ideology or extremism should be ended. Efficiency 1st and fairness 2nd.
7. Always talk of "growth, growth, growth" in a finite world. It's very strange to me and reminds me of Dr. Suess's "The Lorax". Why don't we hear more talk of stabilization, loss prevention, and greater efficiency? It seems like our economic model is lagging behind the real world situation by about 500 years. Does anyone else agree?
8. OPEC was nothing more than an illegal cartel controlling price now perhaps the free market will determine price!!!
9. CO2 is not a green house gas methane and water vapour is green house gas
10. Don't worry a dollar collapse will fix your global warming. And yes it is collapsing every dollar they create is getting diminishing returns on growth
11. Zhu Min has a good point
12. Less coffee for Maria. More English for Min.
13. This wonderfully polite and careful panel is missing the long-term elephant in the room - growing risks of global warming - a progressively destabilizing risk that your own DAVOS 2016 reports listed as the top risk
    
    Where is true cost accounting?  Carbon energy - in any form - is an exponential liability.  It is a temporary asset.   The very definition of carbon combustion is the instant conversion of a fuel asset into an existential liability.  Further, it efficiently delivers profit to a few vendors today -- at the same time it distributes damages to the entire globe and future generations.
    
    (no wonder you don't want to talk about this problem - it's a Gordian Knot).
    
    From the report: "After its presence in the top five most impactful risks for the past three years, the failure of climate change mitigation and adaptation has risen to the top and is perceived in 2016 as the most impactful risk for the years to come,.."
    
    So, what are you talking about? The World Bank gets it, scientists are very clear - stop all carbon emissions now. You are all whining about regulations, yet you ignore the ruthless shackles of physical reality. Food stresses, famine, drought, refugees, heatwaves and wildfires will completely destabilize your best intentions.
    
    You need to change the subject. Banking future is just the bench in the leaky lifeboat of civilization. Where are we going? All your laudable goals for economic vitality are brought up short by physical reality.
    
    Our carbon-energy civilization will be stranding carbon assets, it will happen voluntarily or by harsh reality of increasing global heating. But it will happen And if you don't think that's a risk, then you should refer back to your reports sourced from your own membership.
    
    You had better start talking about the increasing risk from the "climate sector" - because the risks are ultimate. And those of us casting an eye toward Davos are losing respect for your ability to be aware of these financial risks.
14. Insight on how to build the economy for sustainble development around the globe relating to making sound policies that physical impact on the real world @wef #WEF #Economicdev.
15. preventing future >usa +jap >shock is a bit more accurate title- ...mr zhu min's resposive is very correct -- (1) political risk from trouble-maker usa/jap ..always want to ''teach'' their big cash-lender ,China ..(2) structure reform : it's poorer management or infrastruture --no high-speed-rail, poor-facility-airport in usa in comparison with China now... what we fear is power with impunity of american politicians --trump..hillary..2 big mouth ..
16. can someone tell her to shut up and let her guests talk???
17. What are the new financial instruments that are less sensitive to bank runs that Ken refers to?
18. I am a big Maria Bartiromo fan, but she was completely out of her element in this context.  Maria comes from the business news space where the guests/experts are constrained to answer questions in 20 seconds or less.  So when the Davos panelists started getting into substantial discussion (i.e., more than 20 seconds), she starts getting nervous and feels compelled to interject comments and direction.  In this context -- a panel of heavyweight financial experts -- Maria's interruptions were almost always unwelcome, and destructive of the quality of the discussion.
19. oil and nuke power theory will have to end and will be that soon.. Is a loot more others and betters solutions. And is impossible co create place of work for all peoples that to each could do money on all these taxes ... Financial system need deep change ... Can't be somethings as a % income... All this is fake and can be and is controlled by few most rich peoples.. they and everyone can see that don't work and need to be done something to fix this... Of course free energy exist and will be introduced that will fix most problems and after all others solutions... Then Life will be easy and more interestiong with possibilities for everyone on what he want. that will be New World Order .. The entire energy market is directly and indirectly in the hands of the Government . It will be done correctly and energy will be available to everyone, free of charge. Here on Earth is no no common interest.. So that is in interest each of us, even those who now keep monopol on oil and gas solutions...
20. What turns me off about this panel is the aggressive moderation done by Maria Bartiromo......she should respectfully shut up and allow the moderators to finish.