Davos 2016 - The State of Artificial Intelligence
Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money
http://www.weforum.org/ How close are technologies to simulating or overtaking human intelligence and what are the implications for industry and society? Speakers: -Matthew Grob, Executive Vice-President and Chief Technology Officer, Qualcomm, USA. -Andrew Moore, Dean, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. -Stuart Russell, Professor of Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, USA. -Ya-Qin Zhang, President, Baidu.com, People's Republic of China. Moderated by Connyoung Jennifer Moon, Chief Anchor and Editor-in-Chief, Arirang TV & Radio, Republic of Korea.
Comments
-
8:55 "...we're not talking about 'big brother' extracting lots of information and giving it to someone else..." Oh, I see: talking about not talking about it = not talking about it. The technocratic reality is that there is nothing on Earth that won't be done in pursuit of profit. All the 'useful' utilitarian-ist products and technology are not the goal of this, clearly. If the altruistic idea of, "supplementing human labor/effort/energy (time) with technology WAS the end-goal, we would fing have it. The desired result is not, engineering useful tools and products to assist in the human experience, it is the EXACT OPPOSITE; engineering the human experience AROUND A PRODUCT. Totally fing backwards capitalist bullshit hypocrisy. The paradigm OF CAPITALISM IS = INEFFICIENCY. All these wonderful technologists are theorizing and developing these ideas in some scientific nirvana that doesn't exist in reality. The reality is it's more profitable to have better bombs than air quality; better jets than cars; WAR than PEACE. The technology exists collectively around the world to free up 90% of our time and energy, but as long as people believe "Their (bad-thing) exists, so we need to have more/better (bad-thing)." It's so simple and yet so pitifully incomprehensible to, what in reality are cyborg-programmed humans. "Hate exists because IIIIII hate; intolerance exists because IIIII'M intolerant." These "things" do not exist anywhere outside OURSELVES.
-
Can somebody specify what did the Korean Inventor invent --something she said as "Toimang" ?
-
put her in sailor moon costume pleeeeaase ^_^
-
Either, this Asian is a Robot, or has way too much BOTOX in her friggin Face.
-
That's interesting, a build in database in our fortex.
-
In this debate they're talking about ICT, not AI.
-
25 years ago people were just as enthusiastic about AI as now...
-
Try googles Quick Draw. It's not the program that's learning which decision it should make, the players learn how to draw....
-
A database and an algorithm is a program, just ordinary software. What's artificial intelligent about it?
-
14.35 "it's a rule based system". Absolutely right, has nothing to do with AI.
-
Wow, it could keep your agenda... Maybe in the future it could suggest what I should eat. All nothing more than intelligent use of a database.
-
It's still more about intelligent programming than intelligent programs.
-
do you think ai will tell us when it takes over
-
Alien brains are superier to Human brains.
-
got a great idea, lets put the camera right there so it is legs legs legs
-
It is ridiculous to suggest that you can upload your memory into a computer and live forever. You will die. What will live forever is a computer emulation of your self.
-
lmao, i see other people noticed the demonstration given in this interview, and hopefully you also understand the real nature of the interview. : )
-
Concern for the double jobber huh, what a fucking traitor
-
No way she is AI, unless she is a very narrow AI designed to test whether or not a comically unqualified moderator can derail an otherwise interesting panel.
-
19:11 Chinese guy to the far right is sleeping.
55m 9sLenght
1457Rating