Decentralized global rebellion against neoliberal economic policies-Max Keiser-03-11-2011-(Part1)
Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money
http://www.presstv.com/Program/169496.html In this edition of Press TV's on the edge with Max Keiser, Max discusses the link between the worker's struggle in Wisconsin and the revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia with the journalist and blogger, David DeGraw. DeGraw believes what we are seeing in Wisconsin, Egypt, Tunisia and all over the world is a decentralized global rebellion against neo-liberal global economic policies. He believes the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, the IMF and the World Bank are the constituents of this destructive force.
Comments
-
Neoliberals misinform. Neonazis charge on. Neohippies commentate and hide out in the woods.
-
When Max says "What ARE they waiting for"?... I get chills. The longer the people of the US dither & refuse to move on these filthy politicos, who are selling them and their children forever down the river, the more the pressure of anger, fear, & hate will build. The more the people lose, their jobs, their homes, their retirements.. the more the emotion will build, until when it finally explodes it will be horrendous! What is coming is going to be simply AWFUL!
-
@karenbcz22 You need to go back and look at the origin and meaning of classical liberalism, liberalism, neo-liberalism, etc. Corporatism does indeed utilize neo-liberal arguments, at least in the US (it didn't in Italy under Mussolini, who was more of a socialist). Please just do yourself a favor and read the wikipedia entry for neo-liberalism, its not some made-up term - Max does know what he is talking about. Bankers are not "neo-conservative" - they don't care about "spreading democracy".
-
@TheBullionBull what a misnomer. The correct word should be neo-conservative. Very ORWELLIAN indeed. Up is down, war is peace, strong is weak ... Corporatism is "neo-liberal"? Wealthy Corporatists and Bankers are "neo-liberal"? NOT!
-
@necro606 Yup I got it thanks. But I can't retract the statement that youtube is up to something...
-
@TheMchap123 I think you've got it a little mixed up. They pay off the government and use it's power for their own benefit. They build confidence in government so that this process is more effective. What globalists say that big government is bad? cause I don't know of any.
-
Anonimous may be part of the government, the whole thing may be a massive conspiracy
-
Progressives are the useful idiots that the government needs to perpetuate this government for the benefit of the Fascists. Socialism and Fascism are both bad. I will only advocate for capitalism. It worked then, it will work now.
-
What libertarian would support seizing peoples wealth. Yeah I get it Hank Paulson is an asshole but stealing his money and giving it to the bloated public unions is completely ridiculous. This class warfare stuff is not libertarian. Libertarians do not care if you are rich as long as you made it on your own. The problem today is crony capitalism where the connected rich get bailed out on the back of the middle class. That is a function of a government that is to big.
-
@TheMchap123 Globalists and the fortune 100 use government to pass laws that benefit them. They also rely on the federal reserve to bail them out and create inflation to increase the wealth gap. Neither of those are conservative policies. Neo-Cons don't believe that government and taxes are bad. Look at the patriot act and the wars in the middle east. Governments and taxes are the problem, and that is a libertarian perspective.
-
Great info as usual Max! Thanks!
-
@karenbcz22 Wow please look up neo-liberal economic policy.
-
@TheMchap123 As far as I understand they are the same group, that is if you can label them as a group. The whole point of Anonymous is just that. They are anonymous people, not a specific group, but just people that use the phrase 'Anonymous'.
-
Maybe those poor teachers should be striking at the Federal Reserve and then I will join them.
-
@karenbcz22 The globalists are neither liberal nor conservative. They are a predator class. "Neo-Conservative" and "Neo-Liberal" are terms to distinguish them from real liberals and conservatives. But since their policies often involve claims that the government is going to fix societies problems, they more closely resemble liberal policies than conservative ones.
-
As Keiser's guest asks that individuals "share their wealth" which is itself an apology for obtaining it in the first place; what sort of screwed up morality would make those that would receive it? Furthermore, sharing wealth is fucking communism, whatever way you look at it. That logic is as totally fucked up as it were spoken from and by a true liberal!!
-
Max's guest is confusing Libertarians with republicans.
-
@TheGmcFilms type in wwwdotzerohedgedotcom
-
Neo "liberal" my ass! Please stop this misinformation. The Illuminati, the bankers, Wall Street, the rockefellers, the duponts, the bushes, the Trumps ... The SUPER WEALTHY are NOT "liberals". Why don't you call them what they are? Conservative NEO-FASCISTS!
-
@DRationalOne I think you are probably right, but I am trying to be hopeful. I am too often cynical.
12m 19sLenght
112Rating