Exposing the Dark Agenda Behind the "Resource-Based Economy"

Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money

1. Die cavemen !!
2. RBE is "one world" totalitarianism!!
3. No agenda. Finding the best method to serve the greatest good, using the scientific method. What traps a lot of people is the pre-filter to either be open to, or wholly object to outside ideas. Anything foreign, whether a good idea or a bad one, is not looked on by merit. The actual concept is not addressed other than a skirting over of the principles, locking on one idea then attaching it to nefarious motives, building a case against it. Then there are the Self Appointed Guardians of the Status Quo.
4. There is no resource based economy, it's just a idea. I'm working on it now, which means computing synergic physical relationships. If you know any of this, give a sound and we can coop.
5. I wish there was a way to block these videos from coming up when I do searches.
6. These guys are fucking goons.
7. It's about killing LOGOS.
8. Take for example. how much of an affect the ISDS has on Canada been sued for defending civil rights.
9. I think technocracy was a form of control which was used already by the Dutch V.O.C. which it was not Dutch as the Jews from Portugal and Spain controled more than 80% of the Voc.  I am sure Technocracy has its origings in the Talmund.
10. One invention like the combine, freed up thousands to specialize and create and invent and to learn and to teach etc ect, but the notion of conservation and doing with less and over populations instead of abundance and ingenuity and free market with fair regulations, is still the promoted theme, because it's not about an engineered scarcity of resources it's about control, if you can't get people to hand over their time and things by providing value then you engineer circumstance whereby they are forced to, this really defines the central banks and globalism's purpose. If there was a free market creators, inventors, even labourers in many ways would be most compensated and therefore yield the most socio-economic power but instead criminal banking cartels do
11. Wow, it's like there are problems with privacy, that humans can't never ever solve scientifically, technically and philosophically? ;)
12. Everyone who is trying to bang the Resource Based Economy simply does not understand it, does not understand even the limited world we all live in. Just Bullshit.
13. this video is complete waste of time.
14. I haven't heard a shred of evidence that anything saying that ideas under the collective umbrella name of 'technocracy' are evil. If Mr. Wood is such an expert on this as on some other topics here, then it's been a real waste of time. The overall interview lacked focus, facts and went beside the point.
    
    No-one is encroaching on self-determination of peoples of Europe, while EU is a concerted effort to achieve goals and raise a standard of living for everyone. I say this with confidence, as my country was a major recipient of EU help and our economy grew twice in the last 25 years. It's like you have no idea...
    
    Nothing bad with serving greater good - or do you suggest otherwise?
    Efficiency is good. Waste is bad.
    Carbon emissions are currently bad unless we go for snowball Earth.
    Caring for nature is good. If putting a price on limited resources in order to regulate and rationalize the consumption is necessary, so be it. It's humanity's self-preservation in the long run.
    Nothing wrong with new ideas. Analyze, measure, asses and then adopt or trash it. Are you against progress?
    
    Also I say this: There is nothing wrong with a global government if nations of Earth join it willingly and everyone gets an even chance and the spirit of democracy is preserved. Or do you want to remain a divided planet for millennia? How short-sighted is this?
    Do You expect US or Canada be here in a 1000 years? Very few countries accomplished that. The fact is that we will stand united and settle the Solar System or we will wither on an exploited world.
15. I studied technocracy extensively, and it's not that the big bankers want to stop using money, where everyone instead barters, so to speak, using energy credits. What they want to do, is ti simply monetize energy use, so it is then considered new goods and services to be bought and sold, so they can print money to match it. It's just an additional way the fed bankers can print more new currency for themselves, or digital credits or whatever money they are using, but it won't mean an end to money or digital dollars. It just means the fed banks can issue more of them, which they get for free when they are issued.
16. Curious how they are so terrorized that Technocracy could allow (but won't if we will supervise) a small elite to decide what is right for all, while it is exactly what is happening now (hell, Wood himself, rightfully, talked about the supremacy of Trilateral Commission, a few humans deciding fate of all!)
17. carbon rationing? 24-7 surveeillance? what the hell are you talking about. you know nothing about An RBE. and you better get rid of your calculator because you give your thinking over to it every day. people like you in the agricultural age would have feared and railed against the system you love today if they had known about it. get your pitchfork and stop the evil bulldozers from taking over,stop the development of concrete because straw is the only way. you are a paranoid idiot of the finest calibur.
18. fucking idiots