Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: the difference and why it matters
Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money
Speaker(s): Professor Richard Rumelt Chair: Professor Gordon Barrass Recorded on 20 October 2011 in Sheikh Zayed Theatre, New Academic Building. Developing and implementing a strategy is the central task of any leader. Richard Rumelt shows that there has been a growing and unfortunate tendency to equate motherhood and apple-pie values and fluffy packages of buzzwords with "strategy." Richard Rumelt is the Harry and Elsa Kunin Professor of Business and Society at UCLA Anderson. An audio mp3 podcast is available here - http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=1205
Comments
-
What a load of hot air and fluff. If only he would spend more time actually talking about good strategy that was relevant.
-
this guy needs to work on his jokes.
-
Interesting and engaging. The timeline for the comments for a 5 year old recording really speaks to how this topic is still relevant and challenging.
-
Wish the recording also included the slides in the shot. Poor recording capabilities
-
Begins at 26:00
-
Imagine how much more compelling this video would be if you could actually see the screen...
-
This was very very good - Incredibly engaging. The use of real examples really helped.
-
That was fantastic. Thank you.
-
Wow. This guy loves bragging.
Now, I'm not saying he is lying. He just really seem to looove bragging. -
It was very interesting in the beginning, and somehow I lost it in the middle. maybe I am not well educated in this part?
-
In deed, IBM has been segmented in the end :)
-
Great very interesting presentation Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: the difference and why it matters
-
Great
-
great insight really helped.he seen something other's have missed because it was,obvious
-
its just another kind of boring book that you will read but not really helpful (i.e. if you read a lot of business strategy and peoples experience)
-
starts at 5:00 minutes
-
Another in a long line of "presentations" by business school "scholars" using their typical technique of employing vacuous statements, in bombastic tones, to express obvious or incorrect observations and analyses. It is fatuousness personified.
-
I found this to be boring. The flow and focus was lost early in. Nearly every example was taken from a timeframe between Hannibal and 1985. I didn't walk away with one single thought that made me say WOW. Chevrolet's auto lineup 20 years ago and how Hannibal fought wars is of no interest to me today. I wonder how long that presentation has been around?
-
Very interesting presentation.
0m 0sLenght
1435Rating