James O'Brien v climate change deniers

Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money

1. Just curious, how many days a week does James cycle to work?
2. The problem scientists have these days is no one believes they are acting independtly and without prejudice due to how many are funded. Wasn't it UNESCO that said recently that the Britsh society is one of the most corrupt on the planet. Against that background and the British press/media distorting everything it is becoming increasingly difficult for ordinary people to see thro' the mist (no pun intended). In the US particularly there is real concern that as they see China as the main culprit in all this they feel their economy will suffewr as a result of clean energy. measures.
3. The answer is the same as why people who know smoking is bad for your lungs continue to smoke.
4. lost count of the straw man arguments after a few minutes
5. Ignorance must be so bliss ... climate change is very real! :/
6. because they can't be bothered to recycle so if they deny climate change they don't feel so bad about putting glass in the garbage
7. Its yet another example of how the growing mainstream Anti-establishment feeling is manipulated by vested interests. We never seem to learn from history, this fostering of a general distrust in the sciences is awfully similar to the Nazi book burning in the late 30s early 40s
8. 32:45 Sounds like Farage called in
9. [Confabulatory Confirmation Bias rules]
   https://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/research-pages/potential-climatic-variables
10. Gosh lazy and uninformed of Basingstoke. The whole reason that corporations get away with raping the world is because you people keep voting in right wingers who pretend to tax the middle class less but throw the costs of change onto the home consumer instead so idiot from Basingstoke can't afford the changes is what he believes
11. It's simple, isn't it? They would have to significantly change their lifestyles and they are desperado to pretend that maintenance of the status quo is even possible. This debate speaks to a larger issue whereby Farage and Johnson can paint lies on a bus and apparently nobody cares! ?! Look at the whole Trump campaign with those racist birther lies !??!People seem to think that nobody can be trusted any more, I wonder why? We need to re educate the Western world in the art of critical thinking and analysis of data. The climate change deniers have loads of oil money behind them spreading the lie that it's not us. Obama has never been able to do anything in the US because the Senate is largely Republican and they own the oil.
12. Teeth /børste. .---up ind Downey. 
13. Thank u tryg forsikring. At i wast Pay my forsigtigt .
14. “If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
15. "Remember the enemy is romanians...that's Britain for you"
    
    Hahaha I am dying of laughter!! :D
16. people on the left and right, and I'm referring to normal people now, inevitably become the mouth pieces of the major pundits of your political leaning hence why they deny it.
17. Why is the Ice cap getting bigger?
18. HAHAH, I have to say JoB is exposing himself in this video. I just got to the bit where he started pointing out the 20k per person the UK bailed out the banks with... It was a hell of a lot more in the US. Who allowed that ponzi sceme robbery to take place? Obama and his cabinet, in complete cooperation with the previous republican run treasury. And the companies and individuals that forced the hands of the US taxpayers were in many respects the oners responsible for what happened over here. Is JoB simply the universes equal and opposite reaction to Nigel Farage? If I have learned one thing over the last few years, it is that all extremism, on both sides, is bad. James seems so cool and lefty but actually the last caller hits him with some other facts, and he crumbles and starts talking over the caller. The guy doesnt have a fucking clue about climate change as a whole, he has researched it for 10 minutes and grabbed a document from Colum Uni ONLINE and then started going at callers telling them that researching online is pointless... Are we supposed to believe the JoB has a line into columbia uni to the actual professor that wrote this? A personal friend is he? Give me a fucking break. Simply put, it is extremist to say that nothing is happening and we should do nothing, and it is equally as extremist to say that the world is gonna end in 40 years if we don't half emissions by 2020. Simple as that.
19. Just to play devils advocate a bit here, but how can J o B on the one hand argue with Nigel Farage about cronyism and his involvement with the establishment he claims to hate, which obviously by implication means that JoB holds them in low regard, and then go on to argue with viewers about why (with absolutely no evidence) Obama and The Pope are more intelligent human beings than anyone with an opinion varient to theirs? Obama and The Pope don't have any fucking scientific qualifications, they are simply the mouth pieces. So his argument is seriously flawed. "Ill just go with the science" and "why do you want to poopoo the Pope and Obama" in the same sentence should raise serious concerns. If your argument revolves around the leaders of The Roman Catholic Church and a country which has torture camps in action round the world, perhaps you should research your argument a bit more thoroughly. Of course climate change is happening, but if it wasn't for the US and Big Oil, we wouldn't be in this situation, so basically fuck off with using Obama as your basis for why you are right.
20. James O brien agree upon a lot its ashame the left have taken it up on themselves that this is real.
    
    Notice the desire to believe it is right James O brien typically does this on this issue only. e.g the time for debate is over no need to talk about science. Maybe if he had a real debate on issue Lord Monckton/Piers Corby on one side v other scientist on BBC couple of hours and let people decide. Scientist have been wrong in past whether that was the earth was flat, malthusian. My main desire not to believe is not just the lifestyle changes by cutting carbon but the amount of people that will die by cutting carbon especially in countries that are developing preventing them getting wealthy. Also paying a carbon tax to fund derivative speculation another reason.