The Global Warming Scare Begins: Roger Revelle 1980
Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money
Roger Revelle - The Godfather of the Global Warming Alarm. The story begins with an Oceanographer named Roger Revelle. He served with the Navy in World War II. After the war he became the Director of the Scripps Oceanographic Institute in La Jolla in San Diego, California. Revelle co-authored a scientific paper with Suess in 1957—a paper that raised the possibility that the atmospheric carbon dioxide might be creating a greenhouse effect and causing atmospheric warming. The thrust of the paper was a plea for funding for more studies. Funding, frankly, is where Revelle's mind was most of the time. Revelle hired a Geochemist named David Keeling to devise a way to measure the atmospheric content of Carbon dioxide. In 1958 Keeling published his first paper showing the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and linking the increase to the burning of fossil fuels. These two research papers became the bedrock of the science of global warming. An environmental movement had been established and its funding and very existence depended on having a continuing crisis issue. Roger Revelle’s research at the Scripps Institute had started a wave of scientific inquiry. So the concept of uncontrollable atmospheric warming from the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels became the cornerstone issue of the environmental movement. One of Revelle's students, Al Gore, took the alarm to heart. Revelle and Keeling used this new alarmism to keep their funding growing. Other researchers with environmental motivations and a hunger for funding saw this developing and climbed aboard as well. The research grants flowed and alarming hypotheses began to show up everywhere. The Keeling curve continues to show a steady rise in CO2 in the atmosphere during the period since oil and coal were discovered and used by man. Carbon dioxide has increased from the 1958 reading of 315 to 385 parts per million in 2008. But, despite the increase, CO2 is still only a trace gas in the atmosphere. Several hypotheses emerged in the 70s and 80s about how this tiny atmospheric component of CO2 might cause a significant warming. But they remained unproven. As years have passed, the scientists have kept reaching out for evidence of the warming and proof of their theories. And, the money and environmental claims kept on building up. Back in the 1960s, this global warming research came to the attention of a Canadian born United Nation's bureaucrat named Maurice Strong. He was looking for issues he could use to fulfill his dream of one-world government. From there, the IPCC and other UN agencies were formed - and the alarm spread to world-wide proportions. However; while the alarm was being spread by the UN for their own purposes, and NGO's and Gore had latched onto the cause for their purposes, Revelle had retired, and had no more need for funding. By the 1980's he had started to have second thoughts about the role of CO2 in the climate system. In 1988 he wrote two cautionary letters to members of Congress. He wrote, "My own personal belief is that we should wait another 10 or 20 years to really be convinced that the greenhouse effect is going to be important for human beings, in both positive and negative ways." He added, "…we should be careful not to arouse too much alarm until the rate and amount of warming becomes clearer." In 1991, Revelle teamed up with Chauncey Starr, founding director of the Electric Power Research Institute and Fred Singer, the first director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service, to write an article for Cosmos magazine. They urged more research and begged scientists and governments not to move too fast to curb greenhouse CO2 emissions because the true impact of carbon dioxide was not at all certain, and curbing the use of fossil fuels could have a huge, negative impact on the economy, jobs, and our standard of living. Dr. Singer says that Revelle was considerably more certain than he was at the time that carbon dioxide was not a problem. See the paper here; http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/revelle-gore-singer-lindzen/cosmos-myth/Cosmos_article.pdf Gore claimed at the time that Revelle had 'gone senile'.
Comments
-
This guy is a United nation-Globalist piece of shit.
If half of his nightmares were true we would have been dead ten years ago.
China was far below the radar when this fruitcake started cooking his insanity; If he was correct about what human activity was doing then once China started guzzling CO2 producing gas and coal it would have seed up the warming so the w would have all caught fire tn years ago:
I call BULLSHIT! Total fucking BULLSHIT! -
No, Climate Terrorism started long, long before 1980. Perhaps in terms of CO2 only.
My mother is currently 102; we were were standing on Manhattan Island in the 1970's and she looked around and mused, "When I was a young girl, (in the 1920's), they were predicting that the Earth was heating up so fast that by the 1960's there would be palm trees growing on Manhattan Island." then said asked, "Do you see any palm trees?"
The Globalist Monsters have had this in the works for a very long time. -
we as humans need to get away from these b.s. scientists, and start a world research team, without hiding any information. like they do to us now. if you cant see the agenda, i dont know what to tell you, but please dont bring the rest of us down, because of geuss work or relying only on what a leader tells you. one more question, WHERE ARE ALL OF YOU GOING, THAT YOU NEED A LEADER?
-
Fuck your agenda and your abuse of history. Cunt.
-
Here in this 1958 ATT film about the weather titled, "The Unchain Goddess", global warming, the how and why, is spoken of.
-
With regard to the Cosmos paper (with F - smoking isnt bad - Singer): http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/05/01/roger-revelle-is-solomons-late/
-
Wrong. In 1957, Revelle co-authored a paper with Hans Suess that suggested that the Earth's oceans would absorb excess carbon dioxide generated by humanity at a much slower rate than previously predicted by geoscientists, thereby suggesting that human gas emissions might create a "greenhouse effect" that would cause global warming over time.Although other articles in the same journal discussed carbon dioxide levels, the Suess-Revelle paper was "the only one of the three to stress the growing quantity of CO2 contributed by our burning of fossil fuel, and to call attention to the fact that it might cause global warming over time.
-
Alarm is a normal reaction to an alarming situation.
Frolly, it's a shame you can't get past your self-fabricated paranoia and conspiracy ideation, but then this is your job isn't it? If you stopped to actually listen to what Revelle was explaining you'd learn some valuable stuff. Also, if you actually listen to his words you'd discover he's extremely conservative. And no he didn't reject fact of global warming - though he was very worried about economy and such also.
6:30 The CO2 problem explained
11:20 atmospheric measurements and what they show
a little history
18:00 The Geophysical Year. I was a kid but remember those early days when learning as much about our planet as possible was of the highest priority, I never lost that passion as I grew up.
Why have Republican/libertarians turned their back on understanding the reality of what's happening upon our planet? -
What is wrong with you 1000frolly? You think putting massive amounts of toxins into the air has no consequences, including CO2 which absorbs heat and then acidifies the ocean.
-
Revelle recanted and apologized later for starting all of this hysteria over nothing:)
-
because of CO2 ... "temperature near the earth surface is about 30° Farenheit higher than it would be in the absence of carbon dioxide" (at about 5:40)
Wow .. what bullshit! But interessting of course, as is shows what absurd expectations there were over CO2. If 280ppm (guess he is refering to that level) meant 30° Farenheit, what will 400ppm mean? Would it fry the planet? Or have, like in the past when there were like 5000ppm, no effect at all?
Nothing adds up about the concept of CO2 an global temperatures. Except of course, that it has got be, no matter what.. -
Thirty-five years ago Revelle understood the "carbon dioxide problem" better than many "climate scientists" do today. He does not sound like an alarmist. I find him very credible.
-
No you have it wrong. It goes back to the 1820s when Fournier discovers that CO2 gas traps infra red radiation - I.e. heat radiation. Later, in 1890s, Arrenhius proposes the greenhouse gas theory for the earths atmosphere. Later still, in 1958, Keeling begins to measure CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, guessing that by mankinds burning billions of tons of carbon every year, CO2 would increase in the atmosphere. And it had - every year since 1958. CO2 is now up to 400 ppm in the atmosphere.
-
Great vdeo thanks for sharing this info. This has to be everywhere. I'll re-upload it in my channel but if you don't want me to just let me know and I'll delete it. All the best.
0m 0sLenght
27Rating