The Political Economy of Demographic Engineering in the Modern World (1998)
Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money
Political demography is the study of how population change affects politics.[1] Population change is driven by classic demographic mechanisms – birth, death, age structure and migration. However, in political demography, there is always scope for assimilation as well as boundary and identity change, which can redraw the boundaries of populations in a way that is not possible with biological populations.[2] Typically, political-demographic projections can account for both demographic factors and transitions caused by social change. A notable leader in the area of sub-state population projection is the World Population Program of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Laxenburg, Austria. Some of the issues which are studied in the context of political demography are: surges of young people in the developing world, significantly increasing aging in the developed world, and the impact of increasing urbanization.[3] Political demographers study issues like population growth in a political context. A population's growth is impacted by the relative balance of variables like mortality, fertility and immigration.[4] Many of the present world's most powerful nations are aging quickly, largely as a result of major decreases in fertility rates and major increases in life expectancies.[5] As the labor pools in these nations shrink, and spending on the elderly increases, their economies are likely to slow down.[5] By 2050, the workforce in Japan and Russia is predicted to decrease by more than 30 percent, while the German workforce is expected to decline by 25 percent by that year.[5] The governments of these countries have made financial commitments to the elderly in their populations which will consume huge percentages of their national GDP.[5] For example, based on current numbers, more than 25% of the national GDPs of Japan, France and Germany will be consumed by these commitments by 2040. The demographic transition from the late eighteenth century onwards opened up the possibility that significant change could occur within and between political units. Though the writings of Polybius and Cicero in classical times bemoaned the low fertility of the patrician elite as against their more fecund barbarian competitors,[8] differential fertility has probably only recently emerged as a central aspect of political demography. This has come about due to medical advances which have lowered infant mortality while conquest migrations have faded as a factor in world history. Differences in immunity levels to infectious diseases between populations also play no major role in our age of modern medicine and widespread exposure to a common disease pool. It is not so much the trajectory of demographic transition that counts as the fact that it has become more intense and uneven in the late twentieth century as it has spread into the developing world. Uneven transitions lend themselves to differential growth rates between contending groups. These changes are, in turn, magnified by democratization, which entrenches majority rule and privileges the power of numbers in politics as never before. Indeed, in many new democracies riven by ethnic and religious conflicts, elections are akin to censuses while groups seek to 'win the census'. Ethnic parties struggle to increase their constituencies through pronatalism ('wombfare'), oppose family planning, and contest census and election results. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_demography
Comments
-
Why Europe will be non white, will be muslim and low iq (Look correlation iq and race. Loook also Helmut Nyborg, Jason Richwine And documentary with english subtitles, Hjernevask, and Charles Murray, Brainwashing and research of IQ and accademic and scolastic success; https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/06/02/individual-and-racial-differences-in-iq-and-allele-frequencies/ ; read ethnocentrism vs humanitarianism
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html
studies on internet. Look Black Pigeon videos on youtube about multiculturalism and see his resources. Look at https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com http://en.europenews.dk/-Muslim-Inbreeding-Impacts-on-intelligence-sanity-health-and-society-78170.html ) thanks to left retardation:
The low fertility rate existed in Europe since the years 70-80. The reason is mainly cultural. The main reason is that the carrjera is now considered more important. Look genocide of Whites in South Africa. In most European countries, but in general around the world, the birth rate has always been higher among women less educated and less occupied. It is bad to say. But women do not want to make more educated children. This happens even in France whose birthrate is 2.01 per woman. European French are on average 1.78 children per woman. The less educated and less absorbed by the work we do more than educate. In fact, foreign non white european women, who have little, or not at all, educated, are from 2.4 to 3.12 children. But this neaauno says it on TV, even if it is explicitly described on institutional sites, because it is racist to say the truth. The European white race is dying out voluntarily. Same thing in Germany. All economic efforts nefli last twenty years, have not increased the rate of birth of the European Women in Business. Women who decide voluntarily not to have children in European countries, "emancipated", it increases every year and the fertility of the most educated women is lower every year. The only incentive to birth would be to remove the old age pension to all the people, men and women, no children, and reducing taxes the cost of living of the middle class. Remember that even in Germany the Univerity is free. The excuse of better living conditions they believe only feminists and those who stop to read the total result of population statistics, without looking at the ethnicity of births, and the economic condition and educatica of women when they are very educated tend not marry and not have children. The truth is that all over the world. Children do not ba more fashion from the eighties to the present. It's the truth. Culturalmenre talking about having children is lame and boring. People prefer to make a career and not sons. The problem is cultural. The rest are bales
It is politically incorrect. But 70% of women in careers they hate children and hate grow more than one child. Extinction European defli is relarivamente immimente (50-60 years). When a people, civilization or race stops having children, for one reason or the other, he dies along with its culture. It is a historical fact. Live (fertility rate 2.1 child per woman) or die. Family culture (and especially of the children = survival). Culture Career and destruction of households (culture of relativism of the Left parties) = Extinction. Simple. We are a unique social experiment in human history. Secularism, relativism, deconstruction of the family and the sense of community, and denial of the cultural problem concerning women (because it is "sexist, mysogeny, offensive toward women who are infertile, which are numerically insignificant.) We are the first people who you are committing suicide due to the constant brainwashing by the cultural classes and and progressive liberals. -
@48 ... This is from 1998 but she reflects the Liberal attitude today that the Muslim problem is non existent. Imams preace that they will conquer Europe through population. This is preached to be their "3rd Hijra", their "3rd Jihad", which will be Allah taking control of his world.
-
Europe is being redemographed right now. With the influx of the latest Million Muslim March it is expected that Europe will be Islamic by 2050.
58m 6sLenght
4Rating