WWI - The Aftermath

Economy | Information | History | Online | Facts | World | Global | Money

1. Really, exceptionally, super terrifically BAD. Not good and awful. If this is how young people are learning history, they will know nothing. Lots of jabber, quick jumps and blah, blah, blah.
2. Mmm, Watchmojo were serious some time ago.
3. NAZI SOUDS LIKE ISIS..............
4. a lot of useful information packed tight thank you for this
5. Ahhh, old watchmojo, i miss you
6. This was literally my homework! haha
7. Is that the clock tower at the old port of Montreal?
8. cant download
9. The forgotten part of this war was the division of the middle east.
10. Impact of World War 1 in Europe 
11. The Germans should never have gotten rid of their monarchy, but alas, they did: The Weimar Republic emerges, the Nazi Party is democratically elected and wins the majority of seats in the Reichstag, and being the geopolitical victors of the Great War, the Germans no longer have any Great Power to the East to deter them from invading France, causing the nightmare scenario of a two front war.
12. Can you guys do something on the history of North Korea please?
13. knowledge, not everyone knows knowledge. india supported by the british and the americans usa fought off the japanese in burma and china. if not for the american british support, india could had been in japanese control. india hiroshima. wwI, wwII those holy bible people. III. 
14. *0:55
15. Wait, America benifited from the war 1:55 :P
16. That is actually true the Indians did certainly did not kill the most or die the most....but Indian soldiers actually fought many battles in all the theaters outside Europe and if it weren't for them, the Axis powers would have gained a lot more territory outside Europe......
17. Think before you speak.
18. That is complete and utter bullcrap. India, by no standard pertained the most largest of roles in World War One. Many soldiers fought in the trenches, India were not the only one, and India weren't the most common in the front-lines. India's soldiers certainly did not die in the greatest of ratio, and I do not see how they could have killed the most. Have a look at some statistics, about 75,000 Indians died militarily. That's 0.2% of their populous. About 900,000 British died militarily. 2.19%.
19. @masterblaster848 when I say Indians, I mean sikhs and Hindus from India, and yes they had probably the biggest of roles, we were the ones that were put on the front lines, our men died in the greATEST OF RATIO AND ALSO KILLEDTHE GREATEST, if you look at ratio of Indians and Britishers. If it werent for us, the rest probably would have been killed by the Germans.!
20. @Computerprohelper This is funny that indians or Zulu warrior were important. They were just exotic and nice to see. They had no influence in any important battle in both ww.